Gottipati Govindaraju, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/14885/2019 · 2025-09-21
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21800 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21800 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010308772019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 14885/2019
Between:
1. GOTTIPATI GOVINDARAJU,, SIO LATE ROSAYYA, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O BUKKAPURAM, NADENDAL MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECREATARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RURAL, GUNTUR GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NADENDLA PS, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declare the action of the 2nd and 3rd Respondents as illegal, arbitrary and
2 not conducting fair investigation basing in the Cr No 97 of 2019, basing on the representation dated 4-6-2019 given by the petitioner herein and consequently direct the 2rd and 3rd respondents to conduct proper investigation in Cr No 97 of 2019 of Nandyala PS, basing on the representation given by the petitioner herein and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
K.S.G. PADMAVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14885 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Smt. K.S.G.Padmavathi, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication.
2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance.
3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 22.09.2025 PSA
4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 14885 of 2019
Date: 22.09.2025 PSA