Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2180 (KAR)

SHAKUNTALA W/O. SHUBAS BADIGER v. SRI SAIDAMA W/O HUSAINSAB BHAGAWANQ

RSA/100307/2024 · 2026-02-10

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH RSA NO 100307/2024 BETWEEN: 1 . SHAKUNTALA W/O. SHUBAS BADIGER AGE. 59 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK. R/O. PLOT NO.18, SECTOR NO.10 NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT & OTHERS. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI./: MRUTYUNJAYA S.HALLIKERI, ADVOCATE ) AND: 1 . SRI SAIDAMA W/O HUSAINSAB BHAGAWAN AGE. 72 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. PLOT NO.19-B, SECTOR NO.10, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENT RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 READ WITH ORDER 42 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO, CALL FOR THE RECORDS, SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.01.2021 PASSED IN RA NO.13/2020 BY THE HONBLE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AT BAGALKOT AND THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.01.2020 IN OS 2 NO. 69/2012 BY THE HONBLE COURT OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AT BAGALKOT, BY ALLOWING THE APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING; O R D E R Finally, three weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench for non-prosecution. SD/- JUDGE Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 25.03.2025 Advocate for the appellants has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this RSA No. 100307/2024 stands dismissed without reference to the Bench non-prosecution as per the Court Order dated 17.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T- By: nth C- By: vk