IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 WRIT PETITION NO. 6625 OF 2024 NAVIN OSMANABAD ZILLA BAL VIKAS SAMITI THROUGH ITS SECRETARY NIRMALA GURUBALPPA HUTAJI VERSUS LAXMAN RAJARAM MORE AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Gunale Vishwamber Digamberrao AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. K.B. Jadhavar ... CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : September 30, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to passage of time, the respondent employee has retired and is receiving the provisional pension, as such, the learned counsel would not press the present writ petition. 2. Considering the above submission, the writ petition is disposed of as not pressed. ( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) ssc/ 2025:BHC-AUG:27302