APHC010308702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1528/2025 Between: 1. M/ S JAIN IRRIGATING SYSTEMS LTD,, REP. BY VIJAY BHASKAR STATE COORDINATOR H NO 11782/B/5 OPP PARK NEAR CANARA BANK GANDHINAGAR HYDERABAD500080 TELANGANA ...PETITIONER AND 1. B RAJSEKHAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND MARKETING. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. R SRINIVASA RAO, THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, ANDHRA PRADESH MICRO IRRIGATION PROJECTS, SRIKAKULAM, 4. SWAPNIL DINKAR PUDKAR, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. M LAKSHMI PRASANNA, THE CHIEF PLANNING OFFICER, O/O THE CHIEF PLANNING OFFICER, DRDA COMPLEX, KOTTAPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, SRIKAKULAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. DR K SREENIVASULU I A S, THE DIRECTOR OF HORTICULTURE, CHUTTUGUNTA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA 2 PRADESH ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondent by invoking the provisions of the Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of court Act, 1971 by taking appropriate steps as per the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 in accordance with law, for willful, wanton and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Honble Court dated 12.08.2024 in WP No.9396 of 2024, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M SHANMUKHA TEJA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1528 of 2025 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, both the learned counsel submits that orders of this Court have been complied with and hence, no orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Recording the said submissions, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 29.08.2025 KBN 4 74 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.1528 of 2025 29.08.2025 KKBBNN