APHC010308062019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14315/2019 Between: 1. SURE SUJATHA,, W/O MAHADEVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 0CC- HOUSE WIFE, R/O ST COLONY, BUDAMAGUTNA VILLAGE, KAVALI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RURAL POLICE STATION, KAVALI TOWN AND MADAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAVANI SIVA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.14315 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 4th respondent in not taking any action against the accused persons in the complaint dated 15-02-2019 and registering the FIR as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, apart from being violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 4th respondent to take necessary action against the named accused in the complaint dated 15-02-2019, register the FIR and take-up suitable investigation to trace out of the missing person and restore him to the aggrieved family at the earliest, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in circumstances of the case and pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri Pavani Siva Kumar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by the learned for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 22.08.2025 Pmk 5 19 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:14315 OF 2019 Date: 22.08.2025 Pmk