Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21791 (AP)

M/s. 14. Reels LLP, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/14239/2019 · 2025-09-02

B V L N Chakravarthi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010307642019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14239/2019 Between: 1. M/S. 14. REELS LLP, REPRESENTED BY ITS 1ST PARTNER MR. ATLURI SUJEEV, S/O. A. RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO.1101, SRI RAGHAVA TOWERS, HYDERNAGAR, KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD -500072. 2. M/S. 14. REELS LLP, REPRESENTED BY ITS 2ND PARTNER MR. YARLAGADDA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. Y.PAPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O 4260 CASTLE ROCK CIR, AURORA IL 60504, CHICAGO, USA. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2 6. THE ANDHRA PRADESH VALMIKI BOYA SANGARN, REGISTRATION NO. 350/2017, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, JAKKULA SRINIVASA RAO, GADEVARIPALLI POST, KAREMPUDI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K RAMAMOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.14239 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the impugned orders of the 2nd Respondent in proceedings RC.No. MC2/4293/2019 dated 19-09-2019 and impugned orders of the 3rd Respondent in Proceedings DDC1/902/M/2019 dated 19.09.2019 as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and violative of Article 19(1) a and Article 19 (2) of the Constitution of India and pass…” 2. Sri Ch.Venkatesh, learned counsel representing Sri K.Rama Mohan, learned counsel for the writ petitioners would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03.09.2025 Pmk 4 09 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:14239 OF 2019 Date: 03.09.2025 Pmk