TAZEEM AKHTER v. STATE TH.SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT AND ORS
SWP/1875/2009 · 2025-09-10
Ma Chowdhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2179 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2179 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 1875/2009
Tazeem Akhter
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
State of J&K & Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Pallavi Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER (10.09.2025)
01. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite name of his counsel being indicated in the cause list, which suggests that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this petition any further.
02. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution alongwith connected application(s).
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE JAMMU
10.09.2025
Bunty
Sr. No. 11 Bunty Kumar 2025.09.11 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document