APHC010307802004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18507/2004 Between: 1. GORRE VENKATESWARA RAO, MOGALTUR(M), W.G. DIST, S/O NARASIMHA RAO, SECRETARY, VADLAVANIPALEM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD, NO. 441F, VADLAVANIPALEM (V), H/O K.P. PALEM, MOGALTUR (M), W.G. DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE JT REGISTRAR THE DIST COOP OFFICER W G T ELURU 2, THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI AT ELURU. 2. THE DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER/, THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OP SOCIETIES, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. VADLAVANIPALEM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOP CREDIT SOCIETY, LTD, NO. 441 F, VADLAVANIPALEM (V), H/O K.P. PALEM, MOGALTUR (M), W.G. DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS CHAIR PERSON/ PERSON-IN-CHARGE, SRI G. SATYANARAYANA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings dt.12-7-2004 of the 3rd 2 Respondent, in removing the petitioner from service as Secretary of the 3rd respondent Society, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, and without jurisdiction and consequently set aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WVMP 3544 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders granted on 11-10-2004 in the writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2004(WPMP 24343 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of the 3rd respondent dt.12-7-2004, IA NO: 1 OF 2005(WVMP 98 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders granted on 11-10-2004 in the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. POLISETTY RADHA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. TURAGA SAI SURYA 2. GP FOR COOPERATION 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed finally, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasion also i.e., on 12.07.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 22.09.2025 MP 4 145 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:18507 of 2004 Date: 22.09.2025 MP