Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21781 (RAJ)

SUNIL @ KALU S/O BABULAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7743/2025 · 2025-06-24

Sudesh Bansal V J

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23468] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7743/2025 Sunil @ Kalu S/o Babulal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Dhani Ahiran Tan Chhaja Ki Nangal, Police Station Patan, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Kotputli) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shri Ram Dhakar, P.P. Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL (V.J.) Order 24/06/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 149/2024 registered at Police Station Babai, District Neem Ka Thana for offence(s) under Sections 312, 109(1), 331(6), 324(4) of B.N.S and Sections 3, 25, 5, 27 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR and co-accused Pintu has been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 11.03.2025. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since long and there is no injury to the victim, therefore, petitioner be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and has been submitted that petitioner is involved in seven criminal [2025:RJ-JP:23468] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7743/2025] cases details of which are mentioned in the impugned order dated 12.05.2025. 4. Having considered the facts that no injury caused to the victim and co-accused has been enlarged on bail and investigation against the petitioner has been completed, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release petitioner on bail subject to condition. 4. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Sunil @ Kalu S/o Babulal shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 5. In addition to above mentioned conditions, petitioner is directed to mark his attendance before the concerned Police Station i.e. Police Station- Babai, District Neem Ka Thana in the first week of every three months. Further, in view of pendency of cases against the petitioner, it is made clear that if the petitioner is found involved in any similar offence, during bail granted by this Court or breach of any of the condition is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail, granted by this Court. (SUDESH BANSAL (V.J.)),J Gaurav/121