Sanaka Bullaiah @ Ragavaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/18197/2021 · 2025-09-16
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21780 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21780 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010307882021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18197/2021 Between:
1. SANAKA BULLAIAH @ RAGAVAIAH, S/O.JANAKI RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/O.V. KOTHAPALEM VILLAGE, KODURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KODURU POLICE STATION, KODURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AVANIGADDA POLICE STATION, AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
5. SRI SURESH, S/O. NOT KNOW TO THE PETITIONER, AGED.
MAJOR, POLICE CONSTABLE, AVANIGADDA POLICE STATION.
AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
6. SANAKA MURALI, S/O.SANAKA RAGHAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O.V.KOTHAPALEM VILLAGE, KODURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents No. 1 to 5 in interfering with the Civil disputes in O.S.No.25/2020 on the file of the Court of Prl. Senior Civil Judge at Avanigadda, Krishna District between the Petitioner and 6th Respondent as arbitrary, illegal and violative of right to property under Article.300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to take action on the complaint dt. 12-07-2021 against the 5th Respondent and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere in respect of the plaint A and B Schedule properties in O.S.No.25/2020 on the file of the Court of Prl. Junior Civil Judge at Avanigadda, Krishna District pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. P DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18197 of 2021
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents No.1 to 5 in interfering with the Civil disputes in O.S.No.25/2020 on the file of the Court of Prl. Senior Civil Judge at Avanigadda, Krishna District between the Petitioner and 6th Respondent as arbitrary, illegal and violative of right to property under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to take action on the complaint dt:12.07.2021 against the 5th Respondent, and pass….”
2. Heard Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the respondent-police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of.
4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. However, the police are directed not to
4
interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 17.09.2025. SNI
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.18197 of 2021
Dated.17.09.2025
SNI
90