MOTI CHOUDHARY @ MOTI SINGH CHOUDHARY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
WPC/4199/2025 · 2025-08-07
Rajesh Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21774 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21774 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:22224
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.4199 of 2025 ----
1. Moti Choudhary @ Moti Singh Choudhary aged about 66 years, Son of Shankar Chouhdar, resident of Shanti Nagar, Ghaghi Bara Tofir, Chhota Lohanda, P.O & P.S-Sahibganj, District Sahibganj
2. Chhatri Singh aged about 50 years, son of Sukar Singh, resident of Village- Rampur Topra, Baluwa Tola, P.O Rampur, P.S-Sahibganj, District-Sahibganj
3. Ramavtar Mahto, aged about 73 years, son of Late Ayodhya Mahto, resident of Village-Rampur Topra, Baluwa Tola, P.O. Rampur, P.S-Sahibganj, District Sahibganj
…. …. Petitioners -Versus-
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. The Commissioner, Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka at P.O. and P.S.- Dumka, District-Dumka
3. The Deputy Commissioner, Sahibganj, at P.O. and P.S. Sahibganj, District- Sahibganj.
4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sahibganj, at P.O. and P.S. Sahibganj, District- Sahibganj.
5. The Circle Officer, Borio, at P.O. and P.S. Borio, District- Sahibganj.
6. Ramu Uraon
7. Lachhu Uraon @ Laxman Uraon
8. Tholwa Uraon All sons of Late Gundla Uraon, resident of Ghoghi, P.O & P.S. Jirwabari, District- Sahibganj
…. …. Respondents ----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----
For the Petitioners
: Mr. SAnjeev Thakur, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Ankit Kumar, AC to SC-I ----
02/Dated: 07th August, 2025
1. The present writ petition has been filed following reliefs:-
“For setting aside notice 17.07.2025 issued by respondent No.5 (Annexure-5), whereby and whereunder the petitioners have been
directed to vacate land of mouza Ghoghi, P.S. No. 38, Jamabandi No. 16, Plot No. 97 of area 8-13-13 dhoor in view direction order dated 02.09.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No.4833/2024 and also several orders passed by respondents in connection with
order dated 06.09.2016/16.01.2017 passed in revenue eviction suit no. 14/2013-14, ignoring the fact that 'Revenue Misc" Rev No. 217/2024-25 is still pending in connection with order dated 06.09.2016/16.01.2017 and also
2025:JHHC:22224
2. W.P(C) No.4199 of 2025 pendency of Title Suit No. 16/2014 before the Court of Civil Judge-I at Sahibganj.”
2. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that against the impugned original order, for which, execution case has been filed, an application has been preferred before the revisional authority being Revenue Misc. Revision No.217/2024-25.
3. In view of the pending proceeding, the present writ petition is hereby,
disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to prefer application before the revisional authority for stay within a week. If any such application is preferred, then the revisional authority is
directed to consider the same and pass an appropriate order on urgent basis in accordance with law giving due opportunity to the affected parties.
4. Pending interlocutory application, if any, also stands disposed of.
5. Till 18th August, 2025, there should be no execution of the notice dated 17.07.2025 passed by the Circle Officer, Borio, Sahibganj.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) Raja/- Uploaded