Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21772 (AP)

PABBIREDDY NAGALAKSHMI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/15504/2025 · 2025-06-25

Challa Gunaranjan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

V. \ APHC010307962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 15504 OF 2025 Between: Pabbireddy f^galakshmi, W/o. Assistant (under suspension) R/o. D.No 2-42, Ulimeswaram, Peddapuram Mandal, Kakinada District. P. Venkata Ramana aged 37 years, Occ Field ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj AND Ftural Development, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi ' 2. The District Collector and District Project Coordinator, for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural - Employment Guarantee Scheme Kakinada District, Kakinada. 3. The Project Director and Joint Secretary Management Agency, Kakinada District, Kakinada. ^' 4. The Assistant Project Director, District Water Management Agency Kakinada duster, Kakinada District 5. The Mandal Parishad Development officer, Peddapuram Kakinada District.' The District Water Mandal, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the * ^stances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be writ, order or direction, more particularity one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, directing the 2"^^ Respondent to consider the Appeal Dt. 06.06 2025 in pursuance of the Termination Order vide RC No. HR/08/EGS/DWAMA/2024, Dt. 02:05.2025 (received on 03.06.2025) passed by 3'^'^ Respondent, as required under Point 13 (C) of Circular No. 66'6/EGS(P)/2012, dt. 08.01.2013 in the interest of justice by declaring arbitrary action of the Respondents as illegal, unjust and violation of the article 14 and 21 of the constitution of India lA NO: 1 OF 2Q2fi \ , pldised to issue an appropriate Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2 Respondent to consider ^e Appeal Dt. 06.06^025 i pursuance of the Termination Order Dt. 02.05.2025 (received on 03-06-25) passed by 3"'^ Respondent, pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest nd in of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMANA ALLU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4: SRI M.S.R. CHANDRA MURTHY, SC FOR MGNREGS Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI Y.KOTESWARA RAO, SC FOR ZPP, MPP & GRAM PANCHAYAT, . The Court made the following order: X. APHC010307962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) tV [3506] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 15504/2025 Between: Pabbireddy Nagalakshmi ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.RAMANA ALLU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SERVICES I ir vv .r .isju. I ui tLKj^^ The Court made the following Order; Heard Sri Ramana Allu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. Petitioner is working as Field Assistant and she has been placed under 2. rd suspension pending enquiry. Later, after conducting due enquiry, 3 respondent has passed termination orders dated 02.05.2025 terminating the services of the petitioner. Assailing the same, the petitioner preferred an appeal before 2'^^ respondent on 06.06.2025. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that 2'^'^ respondent is not deciding the said appeal. 3. Sri M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that appeal filed by the petitioner would be disposed of within a period of 30 days. In view of the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing 2^'^ respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders of appeal dated 06.06.2025 preferred by petitioner, after providing due opportunity of 4. hearing within a period 30 days from the date of receipt of the order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M.PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Panchayat Raj and Rural of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, 1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Development Amaravathi State 2. The District Collector and District Project Coordinator for the Mahatma W"- Employment Guarantee Scheme Kakinada Gandhi National Rural - District, Kakinada. 3. The Project Director and Joint Secretary, The District \>Vater Management Agency, Kakinada District, Kakinada. 4. The Assistant Project Director, ^rict Water Management Kakinada Cluster, Kakinada District 5. The Mandal Parishad Development officer, Peddapurarn ' Mandal, Kakinada District. Agency 6. One CC to Sri Ramana Allu, Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to Sri M.S.R. ChaKdra Murthy, SC for MGNREGS[OPUC] 8. One CC to Sri Y. Kotesw^ra Rao, Panchayat[OPUC] 9. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES I High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 10. Three CD Copies. SC for ZPP, MPP & Gram ssb HIGH COURT DATED:26/06/2025 ORDER WP No.15504 OF 2025 I 1 (t JUL 2025 gj ^ . Current Section DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS