Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2177 (RAJ)

SUSHMA DEVI @ DHAN LAXMI DEVI W/O SHRI MANOJ KUMAR BHARGAVA D/O SHRI RAM GOPAL JYOTISHI B/C BHARGAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PP

CRLR/42/2019 · 2025-07-17

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:26851] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 42/2019 Sushma Devi @ Dhan Laxmi Devi W/o Shri Manoj Kumar Bhargava D/o Shri Ram Gopal Jyotishi Aged About 29 Years, R/o Plot No 80, Anand Vihar-A Dadi Ka Fatak, Bainad Raod Jhotwara Ps Jhotwara Jaipur Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, Raj. 2. Manoj Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Kumar Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No 26 Bhargava Mohalla Karundiya Road Ps Kotwali Jhunjhunu Raj. At Present R/o House No D-180 Kardhani Yojna Kalwad Road Ps Kardhani Jaipur Raj. 3. Daulat Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Kumar Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ward No 26 Bhargava Mohalla Karundiya Road Ps Kotwali Jhunjhunu Raj. At Present R/o House No D-180 Kardhani Yojna Kalwad Road Ps Kardhani Jaipur Raj. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 52/2019 1. Manoj Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ward No 26 Bhargava Mohalla Karundiya Road Ps Kotwali Jhunjhunu Raj. At Present R/o House No D-180 Kardhani Yojna Kalwad Road Ps Kardhani Jaipur Raj. 2. Daulat Kumar S/o Shri Mahendra Kumar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No 26 Bhargava Mohalla Karundiya Road Ps Kotwali Jhunjhunu Raj. At Present R/o House No D-180 Kardhani Yojna Kalwad Road Ps Kardhani Jaipur Raj. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, Raj. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP [2025:RJ-JP:26851] (2 of 2) [CRLR-42/2019] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/07/2025 1. None present for the petitioner. 2. Even in second round when the matter was called-up, no one is present for the petitioner. 3. It appears that petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the petition, hence instant criminal revision petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution along with pending application(s), if any. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /36-37