KAMSALA JAYARAMACHARY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/18315/2021 · 2025-09-18
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21767 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21767 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010307732021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18315/2021 Between:
1. KAMSALA JAYARAMACHARY, S/O. SUBBARAYACHARY, AGED MAJOR, OCCU. GOLD-SMITH, R/O. H. NO 27-63, AADI ANDHRA STREET, PALAMANER, CHITTOR DISTRICT. A.P. 517408. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIATE BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AMARAVATHI - A.P.
- 522503. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CHITTOR DISTRICT, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIVEKANANDA BHAVAN VELLORE ROAD, CHITTOOR - 533001. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR TOWN AND DISTRICT - A.P. - 517001. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAMANER - CHITTOOR DISTRICT - A.P. - 517408. 5. SMT USHA, W/O. RAMAPPA, AGED MAJOR, R/O. GESIKAPALLY VILLAGE OF OF CHITTOOR DISTRICT
6. SMT LAXMI, W/O. SASHIDHARCHARY, AGED MAJOR, R/O.
2
GESIKAPALLY VILLAGE OF OF CHITTOOR DISTRICT
7. SASHIDHAR CHARY, S/O. NOT KNOWN R/O. GESIKAPALLY VILLAGE OF OF CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VEMUGANTI MAHESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR and Dr. P.B Reddy
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18315/2021 ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of Respondents 2 to 4 in securing the 4 years child, daughter of the petitioner from illegal detention by the respondents 5 to 7 inspite of directions given by the National Human Rights Commission to the Respondent No. 2 is bad, illegal, void, arbitrary and unconstitutional as well as violation of article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 7 more particularly the Respondents 5 to 7 to release the 4 years old child from illegal detention by handing over the child to her natural guardian father/ the Petitioner and pass…”
2. None represented on behalf of the Petitioner. The present Writ Petition is of the year 2021. It appears that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the Writ Petition. 3.
Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for Non- prosecution. No order as to Costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 19.09.2025 UPS
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.18315 of 2021
Dated.19.09.2025
UPS
620