Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21759 (RAJ)

AALIZA SUHAIL D/O SHRI MOHAMMED SUHAIL v. UNION OF INDIA

CW/9366/2025 · 2025-06-13

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23228] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9366/2025 Aaliza Suhail D/o Shri Mohammed Suhail, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Ward No. 03, Dargah Hazrat Qumaruddin Shah, Jhunjhun, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Education, Shastri Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi. 2. Union Of India, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare, Room No. 348, A Wing, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi. 3. National Testing Agency, Through Chairperson, First Floor, Nsic-Mdbp Building, Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi, Delhi 110020 4. National Medical Commission, Through Secretary Pocket- 14, Sector-8, Dwarka Phase-1 New Delhi. 5. Disaster Management, Relief And Civil Defence Department, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Food Building, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 6. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Through Its Managing Director Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makarwali Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 7. Pm Shri Kendriya Vidyalaya, Through Principal, Old Nh Sabalpura, Near Govt. Science College Sikar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Majhar Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Raghav with Mr. Viswas Saini Mr. Praduman Singh Rathore Mr. C. S. Sinha with Mr. Mayank Kamwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 13/06/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has raised an individual grievance qua the NEET UG-2025 examination and has submitted that the petitioner has filed various representations before the respondents authorities, however, a deaf ear is given to the same. [2025:RJ-JP:23228] (2 of 2) [CW-9366/2025] In the facts and circumstances, this Court directs the respondent-NTA to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, and adjudicate the same within an upper limit of 7 days from the date of passing of this order, by way of a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. It is made clear that the petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate recourse, if grievance remains unresolved, in accordance with law. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /23