Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 217577 (MAD)

Thangavel v. The Inspector of Police,

WP(MD)/23957/2025 · 2025-10-17

G R Swaminathan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.23957 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P(MD)No.23957 of 2025 Thangavel ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Trichy. 2.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Trichy. 3.The Sub Registrar, The Sub Registrar Office, Manachanallur, Trichy District. 4.Panneer Selvam 5.Sudhakaran 6.Nallan 7.Sekar 8.The Thasildhar, Manachanallur Taluk, Trichy District. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.23957 of 2025 9.The Deputy Thasildar, Head Quarters, Manachanallur, Trichy District. ... Respondents (R8 and R9 are impleaded vide order dated 12.09.2025 in W.M.P.(MD)No.19403 of 2025 in W.P.(MD)No.23957 of 2025 by GRSJ). Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to take necessary action on petitioner's representations dated 04.07.2025 and 25.08.2025 in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajalingam For Respondents : Mr.S.Shanmugavel, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R2, R3, R8 & R9. Mr.A.Albert James, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1. Mrs.R.Yamuna for R4 to R7 ORDER Heard both sides. 2.The petitioner has made some very serious allegations against the contesting respondents. He has given representation for taking action also. It is open to the authorities to take action. However, I am not 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.23957 of 2025 inclined to issue any direction at the instance of the writ petitioner. This is because even according to the writ petitioner, he is only a power holder. There is no title document standing in the name of the writ petitioner. Even the principal who executed the power of attorney in favour of the writ petitioner namely, Rengammal has passed away. Thus, the right of the writ petitioner over the property in question is quite tenuous. At the instance of such a person, I do not want to issue any direction. The petitioner is at liberty to workout his rights in the manner known to law. I have not gone into the merits of the matter. 3.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. 17.10.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To: 1.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Trichy. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.23957 of 2025 2.The District Registrar, District Registrar Office, Trichy. 3.The Sub Registrar, The Sub Registrar Office, Manachanallur, Trichy District. 4.The Thasildhar, Manachanallur Taluk, Trichy District. 5.The Deputy Thasildar, Head Quarters, Manachanallur, Trichy District. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.23957 of 2025 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.23957 of 2025 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias W.P(MD)No.23957 of 2025 17.10.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis