Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21757 (RAJ)

NARSI S/O JAIRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7180/2024 · 2025-02-12

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6271] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7180/2024 1. Narsi S/o Jairam, R/o Dera, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar. 2. Sitaram S/o Ram Sharan, R/o Dera, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Koushal Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Ms. Vandana Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/02/2025 1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.PC filed on behalf of the petitioners, who are having apprehension of arrest in F.I.R. No.141/2024 registered at Police Station Thanagazi, District Alwar (Rajasthan) for offences under Sections 323, 341, 452, 427, 504 & 379 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that there is petty dispute between the parties and same has been resolved amicably. Counsel further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioners are not required in this matter. 3. Learned State Counsel opposes the submissions made by [2025:RJ-JP:6271] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7180/2024] counsel for the petitioners. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. She submits that complainant has no objection if present anticipatory bail application is accepted. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that dispute has been resolved between the parties amicably, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 7. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Thanagazi, District Alwar (Rajasthan) in F.I.R. No.141/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners- (I) Narsi S/o Jairam & (2) Sitaram S/o Ram Sharan, they shall be released on bail, provided they furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case [2025:RJ-JP:6271] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7180/2024] so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J LALIT MOHAN /232