Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21755 (AP)

Katikani Niranjan Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/18349/2021 · 2025-09-15

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010307952021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 18349/2021 Between: 1. KATIKANI NIRANJAN KUMAR, S/O. KATIKANI RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O. KOTA VEEDHI, CHENNURU-2, GUDURU, THIPPAVARUPPADU, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. KATIKANI RAMAIAH, S/O. LATE PEDDA VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O. 2/151, KOTA STREET, WRD-8, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE. DISTRICT. 3. KATIKANI NIRMALA, W/O. KATIKANI RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. 2-151, KOTA STREET, GUDUR MANDALAM, CHENNURU-II, CHENNUR, SPSR NELLORE ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY( HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPER INTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GUDUR RURAL POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUDUR RURAL POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DISHA POLICE STATION, SPSR NELFORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K PALLAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in calling the petitioner to the 3rd and 5th respondent Police Station repeatedly and harassing the petitioners by making the petitioner sit in the Police Station from morning to evening under the guise of counselling as illegal, arbitrary and opposed to the established principles of law and further in violation of fundamental rights of the petitioners guaranteed under article 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents herein not to harass the petitioners.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that based on the complaint lodged by the wife of Petitioner No.1 herein, the Petitioners were called to the Police Station for enquiry, but no crime has been registered against them. 3. Ms.K.Pallavi, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to call the Petitioners to the Police Station, in the absence of any crime registered against them. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:16.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18349 of 2021 Dt.16.09.2025 Dinesh