Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010265652023 2025:GAU-AS:13807 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./505/2023 JITU KALITA S/O ATUL KALITA VILL AND P.O. BARANHATI P.S. KAYA DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM PIN-781350 VERSUS BARNALI MEDHI KALITA D/O MANIK MEDHI VILL- KALDI, P.S. MUKALMUA DIST.NALBARI, ASSAM PIN-781138 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. W RAHMAN, MR M RAHMAN Advocate for the Respondent : MS. B SARMA (LEGAL AID COUNSEL), MR. S HOQUE,MR. M ISLAM BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS O R D E R Page No.# 2/2 15.10.2025 Heard Mr. W. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. B. Sarma, learned legal aid counsel for the respondents. 2. Vide judgment dated 07.09.2023 passed by the Family Court, Nalbari in Matrimonial Suit 141 of 2022, the marriage between the petitioner herein and his wife Barnali Medhi Kalita was dissolved by a decree of divorce and the respondent was also directed to pay a permanent alimony within four months. Aggrieved by the same, he has filed the instant criminal revision petition. 3. Perused the last order dated 11.09.2025. The learned counsel submits that he still does not have instruction from the petitioner. 4. Ms. B. Sarma, learned legal Aid Counsel submits that though alimony has not been paid, even without the same, the respondent desires to accept the dissolution of the marriage. 5. Since, the judgment and decree has been passed by the Family Court, the remedies by way of appeal or revision if any has to be preferred on the civil side. The criminal revision petition therefore would not be maintainable in my considered view. 6. Therefore, the criminal revision petition stands dismissed and disposed of as not maintainable. JUDGE Comparing Assistant