Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21751 (AP)

K. Jayarami Reddy v. The District Educational Officer

WP/13912/2018 · 2025-03-06

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010308222018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13912/2018 Between: K. Jayarami Reddy and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The District Educational Officer and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P VEERABHADRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING (AP) 3. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP)-15550/AP/92/1989 The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13912/2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Govt Memo No 33021/466/2017 dated 05.10.2017 issued by the 1st respondent that the orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.148 Finance (HR.IV) Department dated 21.08.2017 are to be implemented with prospective date only as illegal arbitrary and in violation of Article 14 of the constitution of the India and set aside the same and consequently hold that the petitioners are entitled for encashment of leave on half pay as per G.O.Ms. No.154 dated 04.05.2010 and G.O.Ms.No.148 dated 21.08.2017 with all consequential benefits and pass…” 2. Heard Sri P.Veerabhadra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the Court may pass appropriate Orders. 5. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 3 Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date:06.03.2025 UPS 4 69 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.13912 of 2018 Dated.06.03.2025 UPS