Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
AD 255 July 11, 2025 Ct. 28
SG
CRR 1880 of 2025
In the matter of: Saikat Das … petitioner
Mr. Kallol Kumar Basu
Mr. Jannat Ul Firdous
… for the opposite party No.2.
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner although the opposite party No.2 is represented. It appears that the matter had come up under the heading “Warrant of Arrest” upon mentioning by the learned Advocate on Record. Even on the last occasion i.e., on 10.07.2025 no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner or prayed for any adjournment. Accordingly, the revisional application is dismissed for default.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)