Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21746 (RAJ)

MEENA @ BEENA D/O LATE AFJAL W/O ALI MAUHAMMAD @ JIBBU v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7686/2025 · 2025-06-24

Sudesh Bansal V J

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23443] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7686/2025 Meena @ Beena D/o Late Afjal W/o Ali Mauhammad @ Jibbu, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Ganvadi, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shri Ram Dhakar, PP Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL (V.J.) Order 24/06/2025 1. Instant bail application has been filed by petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.205/2024 registered at Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC and Section 66D IT Act. 2. Counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is a woman, who has falsly been implicated in the present criminal case and she is in custody since 19.05.2025. Co-accused namely Arif @ Bablu, Jahul @ Jahun and Ansar have already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench, therefore, in such circumstances, petitioner be given benefit of bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submits that petitioner is a habitual offender and has involved in as many as five criminal cases. [2025:RJ-JP:23443] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7686/2025] 4. Heard counsel for the petitioner as well as learned public prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Having considered the nature of allegation leveled against the petitioner, in respect of committing online fraud and the facts that the petitioner is a woman, who is in custody since 19.05.2025; other co- accused have already been released on bail by the Coordinate Bench; conclusion of investigation/ trial will take considerable time, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail, subject to condition. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Meena @ Beena D/o Late Afjal W/o Ali Mauhammad @ Jibbu shall be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for her appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 7. In addition to above mentioned conditions, petitioner is directed to mark her attendance before the concerned Police Station i.e. Police Station- Jurhara, District Deeg in the first week of every three month. Further, in view of pendency of cases against the petitioner, it is made clear that if the petitioner is found involved in any similar offence, during bail granted by this Court or breach of any of the condition is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail, granted by this Court. (SUDESH BANSAL (V.J.)),J Sachin/110