Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010216142022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. :I.A.(Civil)/2524/2025 CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD . HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT DARE HOUSE 2ND FLOOR NO. 2 N.S.C BOSE ROAD CHENNAI 600001 AND ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT AASTHA PLAZA 4TH FLOOR. OPP. TO S. B DEORAH COLLEGE G.S ROAD GUWAHATI VERSUS RAMPIYARI NUNIA @ RAMPYARI AND 3 ORS .. E S/O SUBODH NUNIA @ SUBODH NUNIYA RESIDENT OF SADAGRAM PS DHOLAI DIST CACHAR ASSAM 788114 2:JAMIL AHMED CHOUDHURY S/O SUJA MIA CHOUDHURY. RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KAZIDOHAR PART III PS SONAI DIST CACHAR ASSAM 788119 3:SRI GAUTAM THAKUR S/O SRI PARSURAM THAKUR RESIDENT OF TAMBUTILLA PS SILCHAR DIST CACHAR ASSAM 788003 4:TAZUL HUSSAIN LASKAR Page No.# 2/3 S/O LATE ASHIK ALI LASKAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NAGDIGRAM KABUGANJ PS SONAI DIST CACHAR ASSAM 788119 ------------ Advocate for : MR. R GOSWAMI Advocate for : appearing for RAMPIYARI NUNIA @ RAMPYARI AND 3 ORS .. E BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 08.09.2025 Heard learned counsel Mr. R. Goswami for the applicant Insurer and learned counsel Mr. A.B. Dey for the respondent No. 1. 2. The applicant is aggrieved by the judgment and award dated 26.05.2022 passed by the learned Member, MACT, Silchar, Cachar in MAC Case No. 1385/2016. 3. The applicant has prayed for stay of the operation of the impugned judgment and award. 4. I have considered the submissions at the bar with circumspection. 5. Considering the submissions, the impugned judgment and award dated 26.05.2022 passed by the learned Member, MACT, Silchar, Cachar in MAC Case No. 1385/2016 is stayed, subject to the condition that the applicant deposits 50% of the compensation amount within four weeks before the Registry of this Page No.# 3/3 Court. 6. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 has submitted for withdrawal of 50% of the compensation. 7. The respondent No. 1 is allowed to withdraw the compensation after executing a bond for verification by the Registry. 8. In terms of the above observation, this interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant