Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21742 (RAJ)

DHOKLARAM @ DHOKALYA S/O JANGLA RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/778/2025 · 2025-10-06

Avneesh Jhingan, Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40432-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 778/2025 Dhoklaram @ Dhokalya son of Jangla Ram, Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of Dhani Tighariya, Tan Samra, Police Station Pratapgarh, District Alwar (Presently Confined In Open Air Camp, Saganer, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Prisoners Parole Advisory Committee (State Committee), Through Its Chairman, Director General Of Prisons, Rajasthan. 3. Deputy Inspector General Of Prisons, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Spuerintendent, Central Jail Jaipur. 5. Jailor (In-Charge), Open Air Camp Saganer, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Singhal with Ms. Bhavna Laddha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 06/10/2025 1. This petition is filed seeking directions that considering the weak financial position the petitioner be released on permanent parole on furnishing of personal bond. 2. The brief facts are that the petitioner was convicted in Session Case No. 100/2009 and was sentenced for life imprisonment. The appeal against conviction was dismissed. The [2025:RJ-JP:40432-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-778/2025] petitioner underwent incarceration of more than fourteen years and currently confined in Open Air Camp, Sanganer. 3. The application filed by the petitioner for release on permanent parole was allowed on 06.05.2025 and the petitioner was ordered to be released on furnishing of two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each and personal bond of the same amount. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no financial means to comply with the directions of furnishing two surety bonds but shall furnish personal bond. It is argued that the conduct of the petitioner in jail through out was satisfactory and had surrendered on time after availing parole on earlier occasions. 5. With the reply filed by the respondent, the financial status report is annexed as Annexure-R1 wherein, it is stated that there is no other property in the name of the petitioner except one seventh share in an unpartitioned joint property comprising of 1.22 hectare. 6. Considering the financial status report annexed with the reply, the order granting permanent parole to the petitioner is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall be released subject to furnishing of personal bond of Rs. 50,000/-. 7. The criminal writ petition (Parole) is allowed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/47