A.V.S.Koteswara Rao., v. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation APSRTC ,
WP/13997/2018 · 2025-03-06
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21742 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21742 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010307512018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION No. 13997 of 2018 Between: A.V.S.Koteswara Rao., ...PETITIONER AND Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation APSRTC and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G RAJESH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SC FOR APSRTC
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“.... to declare the action of the Respondents in fixing the pay of the petitioner in the category of Shramik and not paying the salary w.e.f. date of unfit to the till the date of providing alternative employment to the petitioner is illegal arbitrary unjust and contrary to the APSRTC Service Regulations the provisions of Act 1 of 1996 and the section 47 of Persons with Disabilities Equal Opportunities Protection of Rights and Full Participation Act 1995 and as well as the act is here by repealed (The Rights of persons with disabilities Act 2016) and as well as violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the Respondents to fix the pay in the cadre of Grade-II Driver and pay the salary w.e.f. date of unfit to the till the date of providing alternative employment and arrears thereof to the petitioner.”
2
2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption
“For Dismissal”.
3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for respondent-APSRTC is in attendance.
5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 13997 of 2018
06.03.2025
Mjl /*