Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21738 (KAR)

MR. PRAVEEN M R v. MR. N NIRANJAN

WP/13047/2024 · 2025-01-17

E S Indiresh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1844 WP NO.13047 OF 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.13047 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MR. PRAVEEN M.R. S/O RAMAKRISHNA M.R. AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT NO.51, "SAPTHAGIRI" 3RD MAIN, SATHYA SAI LAYOUT, AKSHAYNAGAR WEST, BEGUR (POST) BENGALURU -560 068. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GAGANDEEP E., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. N. NIRANJAN S/O KRISHNAMA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.1103, 18TH CROSS, 9TH MAIN, 7TH SECTOR, H.S.R. LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 102. 2. MR. V. SHEKAR S/O VENKATAPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO.V2 3RD CROSS, KSSIDC, ELECTRONIC CITY PHASE-I, BENGALURU -560 100. 3. MRS. BINDHU C.B. W/O HARISH K.U. AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1844 WP NO.13047 OF 2024 R/AT NO.23, ANCHANAPPA COMPOUND, PAPAIHA LAYOUT, 1ST STAGE, BTM LAYOUT 1ST STAGE, OLD MADIWALA, BENGALURU - 560 068. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT TO FRAME THE ISSUES AND TO DISPOSE OFF THE SUIT IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO.317 OF 2017 IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW WITHIN A TIME BOUND MANNER; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER The prayer made in the writ petition reads as under: "Direct the Hon'ble Prl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC., Anekal, Bangalore Rural District to frame the Issues and to dispose off the suit in O.S. No.317/2017 in accordance with law within a time bound manner." 2. Heard Sri. Gagandeep E., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and taking into account the factual aspects on record, as the Original Suit No.317 of 2017 is pending consideration before the competent Civil Court for adjudication, I am of the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1844 WP NO.13047 OF 2024 view that the prayer made in the writ petition cannot be accepted at this stage by exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, it is open for the petitioner to expedite the hearing before the Trial Court. With this observation, writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK