Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21737 (BOM)

RAMCHANDRA GANGARAM JADHAV v. MADHUKAR MANIKRAO THOMBARE AND ORS

CA/8857/2024 · 2025-04-03

Shri Rohit W Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 903-ca-8857-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8857 OF 2024 IN SAST/18334/2024 Ramchandra Gangaram Jadhav VERSUS Madhukar Manikrao Thombare And Ors ... Mr. S. A. Wakure, Advocate for Applicant Mr. A. D. Patil, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 9 and 10 ….. CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATED : 03RD APRIL, 2025 PER COURT :- . This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 99 days caused in filing Second Appeal. 2. It is stated that due to some communication gap between the appellant and his Advocate, they were initially not aware about the adjudication of the First Appeal, as a consequence of which a delay has occurred in filing of the appeal. The contents of application are supported by affirmation, the non applicants have not filed reply which indicates that the application is not being seriously opposed. 3. In that view of the matter, I am inclined to condone the delay. Having regard to the reasons mentioned in the application, Civil Application is allowed by condoning the delay. 4. Put up the appeal for hearing at admission stage on 16.04.2025. ( ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. ) Rushikesh/2025 2025:BHC-AUG:10062