IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.10357 of 2024 Date of Decision: 24.3.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Rajo Devi ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that since petitioner has been permitted to continue till the age of 60 years, present petition may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. 2. Needless to say, consequential benefits, if any received by the petitioner beyond fifty eight years, shall abide by the outcome of the SLP passed in Satya Devi case. March 24, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge