Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21723 (KAR)

AMIT ROY v. H H MAHARAI KUMUD KUMARI

WP/8881/2025 · 2025-03-27

H T Narendra Prasad

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:13054 WP No. 8881 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO.8881 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: AMIT ROY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING PERMANENTLY-CTS, NO.114, JAYAMAHAL PALACE, JAYAMAHAL ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 046. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHARGAV G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. H. H. MAHARANI KUMUD KUMARI AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, 2. H. H. MAHARAJAH SHRI HIMANSHUSINJI JYOTENDRASINHJI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS BOTH R/AT: HUZUR BANGLA, GONDAL - 360 311. RAJKOT - 360 311. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BASAVARAJ S., SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. MAHESH ARKALGUD SRIKANTH, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO QUASH AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OD THE HON'BLE OF XXXI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN OS NO. 1963/2002 DATED:21.11.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-AGRANT AN Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13054 WP No. 8881 of 2025 INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HON'BLE XXXI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU IN O.S NO. 1963/2002. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, defendant has called in question order dated 21.11.2024 passed by 31st Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in O.S.No.1963/2002, thereby as per the direction of this Court, permitted the plaintiff to mark the documents as Exs.P38 and P39. Since permission has been granted to mark the documents pursuant to the orders passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.35358/2017, that order has attained finality. Therefore, there is no error or illegality in the impugned order at ‘Annexure-A’. Hence, writ petition is devoid of merits. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE AP, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25