APHC010306722025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SMH TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No: 15871 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. Dhantu Reddiyya. S/o Sri Ramulu, Aged 74 years, Occ; Farmer, R/o 2-73, Lakshmipuram, GolJagudem Pedavegi Mandalam, West Godavari- 534450 2. Dhantu Rambabu, S/o Reddiyya, Aged 43 years, Occ; Farmer, R/o 2-73, Lakshmipuram, Gollagudem, Pedavegi Mandalam, West Godavari- 534450 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat,\/elagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District The Superintendent of Police, Eluru, Eluru District. The Station House Officer, Tadikalapudi Police Station, Jangareddyguderh, Eluru District. The Tahsildar, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. 5. Vigrahala Bhima Butchiyya, S/o Lakshmayya, Aged about 70 years, R/o Kandrika Seetaramayafam (K S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. 6. Vigrahala Raju, S/o Bhima Butchiyya, Aged about 40 years, R/o Kandrika Seetaramavarain (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. Vigrahala Ramakrishna, S/o Bhima Butchiyya, Aged about 45 years, R/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K-S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. Vigrahala Srinu Srinivasa Rao, S/o Bhima Butchiyya, Aged about 35 years, R/o Kandrika Seetaramavara|T (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Elurd’District. , , 9. Vigrahala Sai Pradeep, S/o Baskar Rao, Age not known to petitionerR/o Kandrika Seetaramav^i'^m (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. ...Petitioners And 1. 2. 3. 4. 7. 8. _ u - lO.Adapa Ramu, S/o Venkanna, Age not known to petitioner R/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. H.Peddireddy Nagaraju, S/p Satyanarayana, Age not known to petitioner R/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. 12.Peddireddy Uday Baskar Rao, S/o Raju, Age not known to petitioner R/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. 13. Manchinuru Prasad, S/o Dharma rao. Age not known to petitioner R/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. 14.Vigrahala Baskar Rao, S/o Dharma Rao, Age not known to petitioner R/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. IS.Korukonda Ramesh, S/o Rambabu, Age not known to petitioner R/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. le.Masireddy Ramarao, S/o Mangayya, Age not known to petitioner R/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. 17. Bady Bhanu Prasad, S/o Chandra Rao, Age not known to petitioner R/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. IS.Chinni Durgaprasad, S/o Subbarao, Age not known to petitioner R/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. 19.Tellamekala Venkateswara Rao, S/o Subbarao, Age not known to petitionerR/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. I - ^ 20. Pakanati Srinu, S/o Pothuraju, Age not known to petitioner R/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. 21.Chinni Surayya, S/o Gangulu, Age not known to petitioner R/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. 22.Naradaia Rambabu, S/o Durgayya, Age not known to petitioner R/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. 23.Naradala Srinu, S/o Durgayya, Age not known to petitioner R/o Kandrika-Seetaramavaram {K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. 24.Gollapudi Venkatesu, S/o Nagesu, Age not known to petitioner R/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. 25.Nagulu Srinu, S/o Satyanarayana,Age not known to petitioner R/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. 26.Kistarapu Sathiyya, S/o name not known to the petitioner. Age not known to petitioner R/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. 27.Panuganti Balakrishna, S/o Satyanarayana, Age not known to petitionerR/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. 28.Kotapati Srinu, S/o name not known to the petitioner. Age not known to petitionerR/o Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District. ....Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 herein in not providing police protection to the petitioners as against the unofficial respondents No.5 to 28 and their men inspite of Interim Injunction dated 25.04.2025 in I.A No. 269 of 2025 in O.S No. 62 of 2025 on the file of the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Chintalapudi in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent Nos.5 to 8 and their Men restraining them from interfering with the Suit Schedule property of the petitioner i.e., Ac. 3.14 cents in R.S No. 204/1, 204/5 which is situated at Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) Village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District, further inspite of registering 2 complaints 1) FIR No. 91 of 2025 and 2) FIR No. 99 of 2025, dated 08.04.2025 on the file of Respondent No.3 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No.2 and 3 to provide police protection to the petitioners and their property against the unofficial Respondents No.5 to 28 and their men and followers. lA No: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 2 and 3 to take strict action against the Respondent No.9 to 28 who are continuously interfering in civil dispute with respect to petitioners property i.e., Ac. 3.14 cents in R.S No. 204/1, 204/5 which is situated at Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) Village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K.V.ADITYA CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 28: The Court made the following order: APHC010306722025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15871/2025 [3457] Between; 1.DHANTU REDDIYYA, S/0 SRI RAMULU AGED 74 YEARS, OCC FARMER, R/0 2-73, LAKSHMIPURAM, GOLLAGUDEM GODAVARI- 534450 2.DHANTU RAMBAB, S/0 REDDIYYA, PEDAVEGI MANDALAM, WEST AGED 43 YEARS, OCC FARMER, R/0 2-73, LAKSHMIPURAM, GOLLAGUDEM, GODAVARI- 534450 PEDAVEGI MANDALAM, WEST ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL HOME SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU ELURU DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADIKALAPUDI POLICE STATION, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, ELURU DISTRICT. 4. HE TAHSILDAR, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 5. VIGRAHALA BHIMA BUTCHIYYA, S/0 LAKSHMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/0 KANDRIKA SEETARAMAVARAM (K.S RAMVARAM) VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 6. VIGRAHALA RAJU, S/O BHIMA BUTCHIYYA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/0 KANDRIKA SEETARAMAVARAM (K.S RAMVARAM) VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATHI, 2 HN, J W.P.No.15871 of 2025 7. VIGRAHALA RAMAKRISHNA, S/0 BHIMA BUTCHIYYA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/0 KANDRIKA SEETARAMAVARAM (K.S RAMVARAM) VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 8. VIGRAHALA SRINU SRINIVASA RAO, S/0 BHIMA BUTCHIYYA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/0 KANDRIKA SEETARAMAVARAM (K.S RAMVARAM) VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 9. VIGRAHALA SAI PRADEEP, S/0 BASKAR RAO, AGE NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONERR/0 KANDRIKA SEETARAMAVARAM (K.S RAMVARAM) VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 10.ADAPA RAMU, , S/0 VENKANNA, AGE NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER R/0 KANDRIKA SEETARAMAVARAM (K.S RAMVARAM) VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 11.PEDDIREDDY NAGARAJU, S/0 SATYANARAYANA, AGE NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER R/0 KANDRIKA SEETARAMAVARAM (K.S RAMVARAM) VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 12.PEDDIREDDY UDAY BASKAR RAO, S/0 RAJU, AGE NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER R/0 KANDRIKA SEETARAMAVARAM (K.S RAMVARAM) VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 13.MANCHINURU PRASAD, S/0 DHARMA RAO. AGE NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER R/0 KANDRIKA SEETARAMAVARAM (K.S RAMVARAM) VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 14.VIGRAHALA BASKAR RAO, , S/0 DHARMA RAO, AGE NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER R/0 KANDRIKA SEETARAMAVARAM (K.S RAMVARAM) VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 15.KORUKONDA RAMESH, S/0 RAMBABU, AGE NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER R/0 KANDRIKA SEETARAMAVARAM (K.S RAMVARAM) VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL. ELURU DISTRICT. 16.MASIREDDY RAMARAO, S/0 MANGAYYA, AGE NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER R/0 KANDRIKA SEETARAMAVARAM (K.S RAMVARAM) VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 17.BADY BHANU PRASAD, S/0 CHANDRA RAO, AGE I HN,J W.P.No.15871 of 2025 NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER R/0 KANDRIKA SEETARAMAVARAM (K.S RAMVARAM) VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 18.CHINNI DURGAPRASAD, S/0 SUBBARAO, AGE NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER R/O KANDRIKA SEETARAMAVARAM (K.S RAMVARAM) VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 19.TELLAMEKALA VENKATESWARA RAO, S/0 AGE NOT KNOWN TO SUBBARAO, PETITIONERR/0 KANDRIKA SEETARAMAVARAM (K.S RAMVARAM) VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S); Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 herein in not providing police protection to the petitioners as against the unofficial respondents No.5 to 28 and their men inspite of Interim Injunction dated 25.04.2025 in I.A No. 269 of 2025 in O.S No. 62 of 2025 on the file of the Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Chintalapudi in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent Nos.5 to 8 and their Men restraining them from interfering with the Suit Schedule property of the petitioner i.e., Ac. 3.14 cents in R.S No. 204/1, 204/5 which is situated at Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) Village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District, further inspite of registering 2 complaints 1) FIR No. 91 of 2025 and 2) FIR No. 99 of 2025, dated 08.04.2025 on the file of Respondent No.3 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No.2 and 3 to provide police protection to the petitioners and their property against the unofficial Respondents No.5 to 28 and their men and followers and to pasS lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No. 2 and 3 to take strict action against the 1 4 HN, J W.P.No.15871 of 2025 Respondent No.9 to 28 who are continuously interfering in civil dispute with respect to petitioners property i.e., Ac. 3.14 cents in R.S No. 204/1, 204/5 which is situated at Kandrika Seetaramavaram (K.S Ramvaram) Village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru District, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K V ADITYA CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 5 HN, J W.P.No.15871 of 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have lodged complaints against the unofficial respondents for their interference, despite the fact that the Civil Court has granted an injunction in favour of the petitioners. 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition is closed, leaving it open to the petitioners to approach the trial Court and seek police protection for implementation of the injunction order. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, One CC to Sri K.V.Aditya Chowdary, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies. 1. gi I HIGH COURT DATED:01/07/2025 ORDER WP No.15871 OF 2025 X t% JUl 2® m# ^ Current Section ^ CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS