Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21711 (CHH)

SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT MUDHIPAR v. AJAY KUMAR SINHA

REVP/149/2025 · 2025-07-13

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:32733 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 149 of 2025 Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Mudhipar Through Its Prescribed Authority/ Officer, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, Presently District - Khairagarh - Chhuikhadan - Gandai (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - Ajay Kumar Sinha S/o Shri Vishnu Sinha Aged About 30 Years R/o Gram Panchayat Mudhipar, District Khairagarh-Chhuhikhadan-Gandai, Chhattisgarh 2 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Co- Operative, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Registrar Co-Operative Societies Chhattisgarh, Block-3, Second And Third Floor, Indravati Bhavan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Divisional Joint Registrar Co-Operative Societies, Durg Division, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 5 - Deputy Registrar Co-Operative Societies, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 6 - Chief Executive Officer District Co-Operative Central Bank, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Kumar Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Rajendra Patel, Advocate For State : Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Dy. G.A. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.07.15 10:57:08 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 14.07.2025 1. Heard Mr. Rajendra Kumar Sahu, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Rajendra Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Atanu Ghosh, learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instant review petition has become infructuous, as such, he does not want to press this review petition. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection. 4. Accordingly, instant review petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/-d/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh