SHEIKH MAHI UDDIN AND 5 ORS v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 14 ORS
WP(C)/8307/2022 · 2025-01-21
Kardak Ete
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21705 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21705 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/5 GAHC010264552022
2025:GAU-AS:605
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/8307/2022 SHEIKH MAHI UDDIN AND 5 ORS S/O LATE SHEIKH MOZAMMEL HOQUE, VILL-URARBHUI, P.O.-RADHA MADHAB HAT, P.S.-MANKACHAR, DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM), PIN-783131 2: ABDUL MOTLEB S/O HASAN ALI VILL-URARBHUI P.O.-RADHA MADHAB HAT P.S.-MANKACHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-783131 3: JOYFUL BIBI W/O AYNAL HOQUE VILL-URARBHUI P.O.-RADHA MADHAB HAT P.S.-MANKACHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-783131 4: TOYURI BEGUM W/O LATE ROMJAN ALI VILL-URARBHUI P.O.-RADHA MADHAB HAT P.S.-MANKACHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-783131 5: NILBOR RAHMAN S/O LATE SADEK ALI VILL-URARBHUI P.O.-RADHA MADHAB HAT P.S.-MANKACHAR
Page No.# 2/5 DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-783131 6: SAMIJAN KHATUN D/O HASAN ALI VILL-URARBHUI P.O.-RADHA MADHAB HAT P.S.-MANKACHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-78313 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 14 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT KRISHI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-1100114 2:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PANJABARI JURIPAR GUWAHATI-37 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR HATSINGIMARI P.O.-HATSINGIMARI P.S.-MANKACHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-783135 4:THE PROJECT DIRECTOR DRDA SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR DISTRICT HATSINGIMARI P.O.-HATSINGIMARI DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-783135 5:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER FEKAMARI DEVELOPMENT BLOCK P.O.-FEKAMARI P.S.-MANKACHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-783135 6:THE PRESIDENT
Page No.# 3/5 BHURAKATA GAON PANCHAYAT P.O.-RADHA MADHAB HAT P.S.-MANKACHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-783131 7:THE SECRETARY BHURAKATA GAON PANCHAYAT P.O.-RADHA MADHAB HAT P.S.-MANKACHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-783131 8:JABEDA KHATUN D/O JAHAR ALI P.O.-RADHA MADHAB HAT P.S.-MANKACHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-783131 9:AMIRUL HOQUE KHANDAKAR S/O KOBAN ALI KHANDAKAR VILL-DORUA P.O.-RADHA MADHAB HAT P.S.-MANKACHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-783131 10:AFJAL KHANDAKAR S/O RAMJAN ALI VILL-DORUA P.O.-RADHA MADHAB HAT P.S.-MANKACHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-783131 11:NUR ALAM KHAN S/O AJIJUR RAHMAN VILL-DORUA P.O.-RADHA MADHAB HAT P.S.-MANKACHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-783131 12:SAJINUR S/O MATLANA SAFIK AHMED VILL-DORUA P.O.-RADHA MADHAB HAT
Page No.# 4/5 P.S.-MANKACHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-783131 13:HAZIA KHATUN D/O ABDUL MOZID VILL-DORUA P.O.-RADHA MADHAB HAT P.S.-MANKACHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-783131 14:ABU BAKKAR ALI S/O IMAN ALI VILL-DORUA P.O.-RADHA MADHAB HAT P.S.-MANKACHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-783131 15:MUKSEDUL MAMIN S/O ASKAR ALI VILL-DORUA P.O.-RADHA MADHAB HAT P.S.-MANKACHAR DIST-SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR (ASSAM) PIN-78313 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R ISLAM, MS. A HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR SAURADEEP DEY,MR. P. SINGHA,MR P H KONWAR (R-6,8,9,10),MR S BORTHAKUR(R-6,8,9,10),MRS. R DEVI,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR.
JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
O R D E R
22.01.2025
Heard Mr. R. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Borthakur,
Page No.# 5/5 learned counsel for the respondent no.6, Ms. B. Devi, learned counsel for the respondent no.1, Ms. S. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. Aggrieved by the non-inclusion of the names of the petitioner in the PMAY-G scheme, this writ petition has been preferred. Mr. R. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the petitioners names have been included in the PMAY-G, which is supported by affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents. Therefore, he submits that the matter has become infructuous, which is agreed to by the learned counsel for the respondents. In view of above, the writ petition stands closed and disposed of as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant