Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 217026 (MAD)

V.KALARANI v. THE SECRETARY

WA(MD)/333/2020 · 2025-10-17

C V Karthikeyan, R Vijayakumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.A(MD) No.333 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.10.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.A.(MD)No.333 of 2020 and C.M.P(MD)No.2251 of 2020 V.Kalarani ... Appellant -vs- 1. The Secretary, State Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of School Education, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2. The Director of School Education, Directorate of School Education, College Road, Chennai – 600 006. 3. The Chief Educational Officer, O/o. the Chief Educational Office, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 4. The District Educational Officer, O/o. the District Educational Office, Batlagundu Educational District, Batlagundu, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Section I5 of Letters Patent against the order passed in WP(MD).No.19335 of 2019, dated 25.11.2019. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD) No.333 of 2020 For Appellant : Mr.S.Louis For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam Government Advocate. JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.Vijayakumar, J.) The present Writ Appeal has been filed challenging the dismissal of the Writ Petition, wherein certain clauses in G.O.(1D)No. 217, School Education Department, dated 10.06.2019 has been put to challenge. 2. The Writ Court, after giving certain directions, was pleased to dismiss the Writ Petition. Challenging the same, the present Writ Appeal has been preferred. 3. According to the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents authorities, the said Government Order relates to deployment of surplus teachers for the academic year 2019-2020. The said Government Order is not applicable for the next academic year onwards. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD) No.333 of 2020 4. In such circumstances, according to the learned Government Advocate, the challenge to the said Government Order may not require any adjudication at this length of time. 5. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant also submitted that in view of the subsequent development, nothing survives in the Writ Appeal. 6. Recording the same, the Writ Appeal stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [C.V.K., J.] [R.V., J.] 17.10.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No vsm ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A(MD) No.333 of 2020 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J. and R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J. vsm To 1. The Secretary, State Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of School Education, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2. The Director of School Education, Directorate of School Education, College Road, Chennai – 600 006. 3. The Chief Educational Officer, O/o. the Chief Educational Office, Dindigul, Dindigul District. 4. The District Educational Officer, O/o. the District Educational Office, Batlagundu Educational District, Batlagundu, Dindigul District. W.A.(MD)No.333 of 2020 17.10.2025 ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis