HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25105 of 2025 Court No. - 65 (Sr. No.110 out of 259) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Vinay Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ranjit Kumar Gautam, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the informant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.0109 of 2025, under Sections 74, 351(3), 65(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 5m/6 of POCSO Act, Police Station- Maudaha, District- Hamirpur, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The allegations in the FIR were regarding outraging modesty only, and the said allegations remained intact in the statement of the victim recorded under Section 180 BNSS; however, subsequently, in her statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, the allegations of rape have been foisted upon the applicant as an afterthought after legal consultation. There is no medical corroboration of the incident. It is true that the victim is a minor, but it is a clear-cut case of false implication. The applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 24.03.2025. He undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. have vehemently Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ranjit Kumar Gautam, Shobhit Yadav, Vikrant Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anil Kumar, G.A. Veeru Yadav Alias Atul Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) opposed the bail application but could not dispute the submissions made by the counsel for the applicant. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration that there is no medical corroboration of the incident, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Veeru Yadav Alias Atul Yadav, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. April 23, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 25105 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad