Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21695 (AP)

THE SECY., MINISTRY OF AGRIL. NEW DELHI. v. SRI KONESEEMA FART. AND PESTICIDES DEALERS ASSO. & 2 OTH

WA/1130/2009 · 2025-03-04

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVAjfK TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE o III lO Vi AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI^ WRIT APPEAL NO: 1130 OF 2009 ^ Writ Appeal under clause 15 of Jhe Letters Patent Appeal against order dated 26/10/2^07 in W.P.No.26516 of 2001 Between: The Government o India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture (Department of Agriculture & Cooperation), Krushi Bhavan the on the file of the High Court.^ New Delhi. ...Appellant/Respondent ^ AND 1. SriKoneseema Fertilizers and Pesticides Dealers Association, Registration No. 514/2001, D.No.1-6-32B, Opp to Madala Dolour Main Road, Amalapuram, Rep. by its President, Cherukuri Venugopala Krishna, S/o. Late Sri. Ramachandra Rao Amalapuram, East Godavari District. 2. The Commissioner and Director of Agriculture, Government of A.P., Near L.B.Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. 3. Joint Director of Agriculture, E.G. District, Near: road, Kakinda, East Godavari District. Lab, aged about 54 years, R/o. RTO Office, Nagarjuna ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS LA. NO: 2 OF 2009fWAMP. NO: 2544 OF 2nnQ) Petition under Section CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the common order passed in writ petition No. 26516 of 2001 dated 26.10.2007. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI PASALA PONNA RAO, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA- Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI V. SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: GP FOR AGRICULTURE^ The Court made the following: JUDGMENT ^5 APHC010307172009 Bench Sr.No:-29 [3483] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 1130 of 2009 The Government of India and others ...Appellants Vs. Sri Koneseema Fertilizers and Pesticides Dealers Association and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Appellants Mr. Pasala Ponna Rao [Deputy Solicitor General of India] GP for Agriculture for R.2 & R.3 Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI : 4“^ March, 2025 DATE PC : The present writ appeal has been preferred against a common judgment and order, dated 26.10.2007, whereby along with WP.No.26516 of 2001, a batch of writ petitions were disposed of. One appeal bearing WA.No.739 of 2009 arising out of WP.No.2261 of 2000 was disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, by the High Court for the State ofTelangana, by virtue of order, dated 17.10.2022. Other appeals bearing WA.No.1148 of 2008 arising out of WP.No.12911 of 2007, WA.730 of 2009 arising out of WP.No.2262 of 2000, WA.No.737 of 2009 arising out of WP.No.3561 of 2001, WA.No.1112 of 2009 arising out of WP.No.12508 of 2004 and WA.No.1129 of 2009 arising out of WP.No.4193 of 2006 were also disposed of by this Court as having been rendered infructuous, by virtue of order, dated 21.11.2022. / 2 HCJ & RC, J WA 1130 2009 Be that as it may, since the present writ appeal also arises out of the same common judgment and order, even the present appeal would meet the same fate. The Writ Appeal is, accordingly, disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR ^ %- //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Pasala Ponna Rao, Deputy Solicitor General of India High Court of A.P. [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri V. Srinivasa Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Agriculture, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies. ssb / HIGH COURT DATED:04/03/2025 JUDGMENT 19 MAR 2025 | ^ . Curreni aecwon WA.No.1130 of 2009 DISPOSING OF THE W.A. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS