IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) APHC010306202025 WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15361 OF 2025 Between: P. Jacob Prasanth, S/o.Rt.Rev. Dr. P.Isaac Vara Parsad, Aged about 31 years R/o.CSI Compound, Kadapa Town, YSR Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravati. 2. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati. 3. The Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa District at Kadapa. 4. Sub Divisional Police Officer(SDPO), Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. 5. The Station'House Officer, I Town Police Station, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. 6. Smt. B. V. Sharmila, W/o. Vijaya Sudhakar Reddy, Aged 58 years, Occ Correspondent, R/o New Model English High School, CSI Compound, Kadapa Town, YSR Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh. 7. Kopperla Rajarathnamissac, Secretary -cum- Correspondent, ZION College of Physical Education Kadapa City, YSR Kadapa District. Andhra Pradesh Cell 9848074360. 8. Mrs K. Roda Mercy, D/o.Kopperla Rajarathnamissac, W/o. Karthik, H/o. ZION college of Physical Education Kadapa City.YSR Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh. Cell 9393649008 9. Mr. Daniel Pradeep, S/o. M. Michel Vijay Kumar, D.No.1/775, Dwaraka Nagar Kadapa City. Cell 8885857575. 10. MedigaMoshey, C/o. CSI Church, Rameswaram, Proddatur, YSR Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh. Cell 8499921720. 11. Rev. P. Devasahayam, S/o. P. Yellanna, D.No. 39/431-6-15, Omsanthi Nagar, Kadapa City.YSR Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh Cell 9963415297 12. Rev. M. Jocob Frank, S/o. M.Samuel, CSI Church Compound, Rameswaram, Proddatur, YSR Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh. Cell 9182238425. 13. Rev. Chinnamallela Daniel, S/o. D.Prabhakar, R/o. 4/232, Dorasanipalle, Proddatur, YSR Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh. Cell 9676102910. 14. Rev. B. V. Mohan, C/o. CSI Church, Papili, Gooty, Sathyasai District, Andhra Pradesh. Cell 9490707892. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents particularly, 4th and 5 respondents in interfering with civil disputes and extending threats to the Petitioner in respect of property of CSIRD and directing to compel his father and Bishop of CSIRD to enter into lease , more agreements with the respondents No. 6 to 10 without issuing any notice furnishing information and or following due process of law as illegal, unwarranted, unsustainable, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against Law as well as principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents not to interference with the Petitioner personal life without following due of law. process lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere with petitioner’s personal life including call for Police Station again and again without following due process of law. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. B. RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to 14:— The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010306202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15361/2025 [3457] Between: 1.P JACOB PRASANTH, S/0.RT.REV. DR. P.ISAAC VARA PARSAD, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/O.CSI COMPOUND, KADAPA TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT AT KADAPA. 4. SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICERSDPO, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I TOWN POLICE STATION, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6 SMT B V SHARMILA, W/0. VIJAYA SUDHAKAR REDDY AGED 58 YEARS, OCC CORRESPONDENT, R/0 NEW MODEL ENGLISH HIGH SCHOOL, KADAPA TOWN, PRADESH. 7. KOPPERLA RAJARATHNAMISSAC, SECRETARY -CUM- CORRESPONDENT, ZION COLLEGE OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION KADAPA CITY,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ANDHRAPRADESH CELL 9848074360. RODA HOME CSI COMPOUND, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA MERCY, W/O. PHYSICAL K 8. MRS D/O.KOPPERLARAJARATHNAMISSAC, KARTHIK,H/0. ZION COLLEGE OF EDUCATION KADAPA CITY.YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. CELL 9393649008 2 9. MR DANIEL PRADEEP, S/O. M. MICHEL VIJAY KUMAR, D.NO. 1/775, DWARAKA NAGAR KADAPA CITY. CELL 8885857575. 10.MEDIGAMOSHEY, C/0. CSLCHURCH, RAMESWARAM, PRODDATUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. CELL 8499921720. 11.REV P DEVASAHAYAM, S/O. P. YELLANNA, D.NO. 39/431-6-15, OMSANTHI NAGAR, KADAPA CITY.YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH CELL 9963415297 12.REV M JOCOB FRANK, S/O. M.SAMUEL, CSI CHURCH COMPOUND, RAMESWARAM, PRODDATUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. CELL 9182238425. 13.REV CHINNAMALLELA DANIEL, S/O. D.PRABHAKAR, R/0. 4/232, DORASANIPALLE, PRODDATUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. CELL 9676102910. 14.REV B V MOHAN, C/0. CSI CHURCH, PAPILI, GOOTY, SATHYASAI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. CELL 9490707892. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents, more particularly, 4th and 5 respondents in interfering with civil disputes and extending threats to the Petitioner in respect of property of CSIRD and directing to compel his father and Bishop of CSIRD to enter into lease agreements with the respondents No. 6 to 10 without issuing any notice or furnishing information and following due process of law as illegal, unwarranted, unsustainable, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against Law as well as principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents not to interference with the Petitioner personal life without following due process of law and pass such lANO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct 3 the Respondents not to interfere with petitioner’s personal life including call for Police Station again and again without following due process of law and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KB RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Respondent{S); 1.GP FOR HOME 4 The Court made the following Order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the 1. petitioner is unconnected with the trust properties and he is the son of Bishop under whose control the properties of the society are. It is submitted that respondent Nos.6 to 14 are pressurizing the petitioner through respondent Nos.4 and 5 to enter into lease agreement with respondent No.6. It is submitted that the petitioner is unconnected and has no right or power to execute the lease deed. It is submitted that respondent No.5 is threatening to open rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the event the father of the petitioner does not execute any leese deeds as desired by them. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, 2. submitted that four crimes were registered against the petitioner and the Police called him for serving notice only under Section 35(3) of BNSS for the purpose of conducting investigation in Crime No.96 of 2025. It is also submitted that the petitioner filed Criminal Petition No.5969 of 2025 seeking to quash Crime No.96 of 2025 and the same was disposed off directing the Police to complete the investigation by following the procedure as contemplated under Section 35(3) of the BNSS. 5 S Recording the submission of learned Assistant Government 3. Pleader that the petitioner was called to the Police Station only for the purpose of serving notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS and as it is also submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that the Police would not interfere in civil disputes nor get involved in the dispute between the petitioner and respondents Nos.6 to 14, the Writ Petition is disposed off. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO deputy registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Amaravati. 2. The Director 3. The 4. Sub 5. The Station Kadapa District. CC to Sri K. B. Ramanna Dora, Advocate [OPUC] GP for Home, High Court of A.P. at Amaravati[OUT] To 1. The General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati. Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa District at Kadapa. Divisional Police Officer(SDPO), Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. House Officer, I Town Police Station, Kadapa, YSR 6. One 7. Two CC’s to 8. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT 4^ \ DATED:25/06/2025 ORDER WP No.15361 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS