Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030004232025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/104/2025 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Aizawl Through its Branch Manager, Aizawl Branch, Chanmari, Aizawl, Mizoram VERSUS Sh Roliana and Anr. S/o H.Remruatpuia, R/o Venghlun, Thenzawl, Serchhip District, Mizoram 2:Sh Laltanpui Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Lalfakawma Advocate for the Respondent : Linked Case : MACApp./12/2025 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Aizawl Through The Branch Manager Aizawl Branch R/o Chanmari Aizawl Mizoram VERSUS Sh Roliana and Anr. S/o H.Remruatpuia R/o Venghlun Thenzawl Page No.# 2/3 Serchhip District Mizoram 2:Sh Laltanpuia S/o Khuangthuama R/o Kanan Veng Thenzawl Serchhip District Mizoram Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Lalfakawma Advocate for the Respondent : Mr. L.H. Lianhrima Sr.Adv. for R 1 B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER 21.01.2026 Heard Mr. T. Lalzekima, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 189 days in filing the appeal against the impugned Judgment & Order dated 27.09.2024 passed by the MACT, Aizawl in MACT Case No. 38 of 2020. No one appears for respondent No. 2. Despite issuance of notice to the respondent No. 2, there is no return of A/D card nor unserved notice from the respondent No. 2. In the order dated 28.11.2025 passed by this Court, it has been stated that if service upon the respondent No.2 Is not complete by the next date, the prayer for condonation of delay may be considered in his absence. The Page No.# 3/3 respondent No. 2 is the owner of the accident vehicle. Ms. Ruth Lalruatfeli, learned counsel appears for the respondent No. 1 (claimant) submits that she has got no objection to the delay being condoned. On considering the grounds provided in para 2 and 3 of the application and keeping in view the submission made by the counsel for respondent No. 1, the delay of 189 days is condoned. I.A. is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant