Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21687 (PNJ)

DALJIT SINGH v. BALBIR SINGH & OTHERS

CRM-A/1301/2018 · 2025-07-11

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

230 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-A-1301-MA-2018 DECIDED ON:11.07.2025 DALJIT SINGH ....APPELLANT VERSUS BALBIR SINGH & OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. R.P. Dhir, Advocate for the appellant. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The present application has been preferred under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter ‘CR.P.C.’) seeking grant of leave to appeal the judgment of acquittal dated 16.02.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hoshiarpur, in a case stemming from complaint dated 20.10.2011 filed under Sections 419, 120-B of IPC. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that accused persons namely Kishan Singh and Bakshi Ram, have unfortunately died even during the trial proceeding itself. It is worthwhile to note that in the present case there is no only one accused left namely Balbir Singh, who is also the witness to the sale deed and other than there is no effective parties. In the light of above, nothing survives in the present application. Hence the same is disposed of, having been rendered infructuous. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 11.07.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No MEENU 2025.07.17 19:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document