Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21686 (RAJ)

M/S. F.S. HOUSING PVT. LTD. v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/3591/2025 · 2025-07-18

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:26994] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3591/2025 1. M/s. F.s. Housing Pvt. Ltd., Through Its Authorized Signatory Ashok Singh, Having Its Reg. Office At Plot No. A-4, Airport Enclave Scheme, Durgapura, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Charan Singh Khangarot Son Of Late Shri Mukut Singh Khangarot, Resident Of M-28, Income Tax Colony, Durgapura, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302018. 3. Narendra Singh S/o Shri Laxman Singh Rathore, Resident Of Plot No. 6, Vashishth Marg, Gom Defence Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Rajesh Kumar Singh Son Of Shri Bageshwar Singh, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of B-308, The Crest, Airport Enclave Scheme, Tonk Road, Jawahar Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Dr. R.K. Sharma with Mr. Bhrigu Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP For Complainant : Mr. Pranav Sharma for Mr. Mohit Khandelwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 18/07/2025 1. This petition under Section 528 of BNSS is filed, with a prayer to quash the FIR No.253/2025 registered at Police Station Jawahar Circle, Jaipur City (East), District Jaipur for offences under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B of BNS, 2023 on the basis of [2025:RJ-JP:26994] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-3591/2025] compromise effectuated between the parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute. 2. Learned counsel for both the parties, in presence of their respective clients, have submitted that the dispute at hand is inter-se private in nature, which has been resolved by the parties amicably. 3. Heard and considered. 4. At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to place reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in [2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of which is reproduced below: “12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the nature of the offence and the fact that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non- compoundable.” 5. In view of the position of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition. Compromise is taken on record. 6. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No.253/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:26994] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-3591/2025] registered at Police Station Jawahar Circle, Jaipur City (East) with all consequential proceedings, are hereby quashed and set aside. 7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/44