Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21685 (PNJ)

BALWAN SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/11933/2001 · 2025-07-03

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-11933-2001 (O &M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11933-2001 (O &M) Date of Decision: 03.07.2025 Balwan Singh ......Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Mani Ram Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate, for respondent No.5. JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 03.03.2001 whereby respondent No.5 has been selected under Ex- servicemen (SC-B) category instead of him. 2. The petitioner belongs to Ex-serviceman (SC-B) category. He applied for the post of Constable. He had retired from Armed Forces on 31.10.1998. Pursuant to advertisement of 2000, he applied for the said post. The respondent declared result on 14.10.2000, however, petitioner was not selected whereas respondent No.5 was selected. 3. A period of 25 years from the date of selection has passed away. The respondent No.5, in all probabilities, must have already retired on attaining the age of superannuation. Shivani Gupta 2025.07.04 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-11933-2001 (O &M) 2 4. In such circumstances, no effective relief can be granted to petitioner. The petition stands dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application within 3 months, if cause survives. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 03.07.2025 (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes Whether reportable No Shivani Gupta 2025.07.04 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document