SHERU ANSARI ALIAS MD MUKHTAR ANSARI ALIAS SHERU MUKHTAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./4060/2025 · 2025-09-22
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21685 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21685 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 A.B.A. No. 4060 of 2025
2025:JHHC:29308 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 4060 of 2025
---- Sheru Ansari @ Md Mukhtar Ansari @ Sheru Mukhtar, s/o Hamid Mian, Aged about 36 years r/o Village Bara Narayanpur, PO and PS Madhupur, District Deoghar
.... Petitioner -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner
:- Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Shashi Kumar Verma, Advocate
---- 3/22.09.2025 Heard learned counsels for petitioner and for State.
2.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Budhai PS Case No.22 of 2024, for offence registered under section 366 of IPC, pending in court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhupur.
3.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner and deceased was in friendship and later on she has committed suicide. He then submits that at the time of said occurrence, the petitioner was found at different place as stated by the learned counsel for the respondent State as it has come in paragraph 10 of the counter affidavit and that has been stated on the basis of paragraph no.49 of the case diary.
4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that it has come in the case diary that the dead body was recovered from the well nearby the house and apart from that nothing has come against the
2 A.B.A. No. 4060 of 2025
petitioner in the case diary.
5. In view of the above and considering that it has come in para 49 of the case diary that the petitioner’s location was at different place on the date of alleged occurrence and there is nothing concrete to suggest that the petitioner was involved in instigating the deceased to take such steps, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner.
6. Accordingly, petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before learned court within three weeks from today, and in event of his surrender/arrest, petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhupur, in connection with Budhai PS Case No.22 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 22nd Sept., 2025 SI/