HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11441/2023 Deepak Jhunjhunuwala S/o Shri Kashi Prasad Jhunjhunuwala, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Kasba, Laxmangarh, District Sikar. At Present Residing At A-Arley Street, Maddokshah Skeywer, Kalighat, Kolkatta-700026, West Bangal. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Raghunath Higher Secondary Education Society, Kasba Laxmangarh, District Sikar Through Authorized Signatory Dr. Poonam Chand Joshi, S/o Shri Vishambhar Lal Joshi, R/o Ward No.15, Station Road, Town Laxmangarh, District Sikar, (Rajasthan). 2. Dr. Poonamchand Joshi S/o Shri Vishambharlal Joshi, R/o Ward No.15, Station Road, Town Laxmangarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 3. Rajiv Jhunjhunwala S/o Late Shri Raghunath Prasad Jhunjhunwala, R/o Town Laxmangarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan. At Present R/o 1/b, Nandi Malik Lane, Oswal Bhawan, Bedon Street, Police Station Grees Park, Kolkatta-700006 (West Bangal) 4. Sidhardh Jhunjhunwala S/o Late Shri Raghunath Prasad Jhunjhunwala, R/o Town Laxmangarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan. At Present R/o 1/b, Nandi Malik Lane, Oswal Bhawan, Bedon Street, Police Station Grees Park, Kolkatta-700006 (West Bangal) 5. Rinku Biyani S/o Shri Vishvanath Biyana, R/o Ward No. 18, Kasba Fatehpur, District Sikar, Rajasthan, 6. Nemichand Dhaka S/o Shri Bhagwan Ram, R/o Village Bhumabada, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 7. Babulal Godara S/o Shri Mohansingh, R/o Jaat, R/o Ram Kandlau, Post Badaranau, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 8. Ajay Nirania S/o Shri Sanwarmal Nirania, R/o Ward No. 20, Kasba Laxmangarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 9. Hemant Jangir S/o Shri Yagyadutt Jangir, R/o 150/1, Bhagwan Bahubali Nagar, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (2 of 2) [CW-11441/2023] ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B. L. Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 04/03/2025 Petitioner has filed the present writ petition in which it has been mentioned stated that plaintiff and defendants collusively withdrew the suit on the basis of compromise, wherein the petitioner was not a party. So, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30.05.2023 passed by the trial court. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. On account of compromise between the parties, the trial court had simply dismissed the plaintiff’s suit as withdrawn, but no decree was drawn. In this view of the matter, petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy, in accordance with law. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Jatin /221