Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21681 (RAJ)

DEEPESH KUMAR PARCHWANI S/O DILIP KUMAR PARCHWANI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/9713/2025 · 2025-07-07

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24851] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9713/2025 Deepesh Kumar Parchwani S/o Dilip Kumar Parchwani, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Sindhi Colony, Tonk, District Tonk (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director (Gazetted), Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Chouhan with Mr. Ritesh Kumawat For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 07/07/2025 Although, this writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to continue services of the petitioner as Pharmacist (urgent temporary basis) but, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would feel contented if he is permitted to submit a representation with the respondents to consider his case in the light of an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 27.05.2025 passed in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.11074/2025. [2025:RJ-JP:24851] (2 of 3) [CW-9713/2025] In the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra), this Court observed as under:- “Be that as it may, the petitioners may file their representation(s) with the concerned Chief Medical and Health Officers for redressal of their grievances. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to consider engagement/continuous of the petitioners on the post of Pharmacist, in case they feel that the services of the petitioners are required by them. The present writ petitions stand disposed of, accordingly. The stay applications also stand disposed of, accordingly.” Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notices to the respondents:- 1. The petitioner is at liberty to submit a representation with the respondents for redressal of his grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today. 2. The respondents are directed to consider the representation within a period of twelve weeks from the date of its receipt in the light of observation made by a coordinate Bench of this [2025:RJ-JP:24851] (3 of 3) [CW-9713/2025] Court in the case of Kaushik Kumar Pandya & Ors. (supra). Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/66