Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2168 (RAJ)

KANAK LAL S/O RADHESHYAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/519/2025 · 2025-01-16

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 519/2025 1. Kanak Lal S/o Radheshyam, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vill. Khohara Kalan, Biletha, Teh. Jahazpur, Distt. Bhilwara (Raj.) 311203 2. Ravipal Singh S/o Raghuveer Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo. Chirani, Teh. Khetri, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 333503 3. Pradeep Sakrawal S/o Kalu Ram Sakrawal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Mkb 410 Manoharpura, Kachhi Basti Jagatpura, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.) 302025 4. Kavita Doon D/o Dungarram Doon, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Nayabas, Post Minda, Teh- Nawa, District Nagaur (Raj.) 341509 5. Sunil Kumar Bohra S/o Chetan Lal Bohra, Aged About 30 Years, R/o D-231 Jagdamba Nagar Back Side Of Heerapura Power House Ajmer Road, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.) 302021. 6. Narendra Kumar Saini S/o Pokhar Mal Saini, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No.06, Kuwa Gopalya, Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu, Raj., 333307. 7. Dimple Shekhawat D/o Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ward No. 4 Vpo Aspura Via Ajitgarh, Teh. Shrimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.) 332701 8. Naresh Kumar Soni S/o Ram Gopal Soni, Aged About 34 Years, Ward No. 15 Mandawa, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 333704. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur, Rajasthan, Jaipur, 302005. 2. Director, Directorate Of Treasury And Accounts, Jyoti Nagar, Lalkothi Jaipur, 302007. 3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Secretary, Rajya Krishi Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018. ----Respondents (2 of 2) [CW-519/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 16/01/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the instant matter can be decided in the light of the dictum encapsulated in SBCWP No. 12726/2024 titled as Vikram Verma & Ors. vs. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, wherein categorical directions were passed to consider the representation filed by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner has prayed for the similar relief. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in light of Vikram Verma (supra) and the ratio passed therein shall be made applicable qua the petitioner in equal terms. (SAMEER JAIN),J ANIL SHARMA/32