SAVINA KUMARI W/O SUNIL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/8754/2021 · 2025-02-27
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21679 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21679 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:8673] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8754/2021 Savina Kumari W/o Sunil Kumar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 6/128, Sfs, Aggarwal Farm, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Raj.)- 302020. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Department Of Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.)
3. Rajasthan Public Service Commission Through Its Secretary, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta with Mr. Nankeel Bansal Mr. Shreyansh Dhariwal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Namita Parihar, Dy.GC Mr. Mirza Faisal Baig HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 27/02/2025
Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the instant matter is no more res integra and a bunch of petitions with akin factual narrative and lis has been dismissed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4777/2021 titled as Surjan Lal Dhawan & Ors vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly conceded with the aforementioned contentions howsoever, learned counsel has submitted that identical matters are subjudice before the Division Bench of this Court in D.B.SAW No.636/2024.
[2025:RJ-JP:8673] (2 of 2) [CW-8754/2021] Considering the same, as the matter is subjudice before Division Bench, the present petition is disposed of, in terms of the ratio encapsulated in Surjan Lal Dhawan & Ors (Supra) decided vide order dated 25.08.2023. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/s-623