Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21679 (KAR)

H S RAVI BABU v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8604/2020 · 2025-01-25

Jyoti Mulimani

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3370 WP No. 8604 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 8604 OF 2020 (GM-PDS) BETWEEN: H.S.RAVI BABU SON OF LATE SHARANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDENT OF MEDHAGINAKERE, JAGALUR TALUK, DAVENGER, DISTRICT-577 528. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.K.MANJUNATH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE 560 001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT, DAVANAGERE-577 002. 3. JOINT DIRECTOR OF FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLES, AND CONSUMER DISPUTES DEPARTMENT, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT, DAVANAGERE-577 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3370 WP No. 8604 of 2020 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.B.K.Manjunath., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner to withdraw the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the order and will not file the Review Petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20