PENTAKOTA TIRUMALA VENKATA SEETHAMMA NAIDU @ SANJAY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/15418/2025 · 2025-06-25
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21677 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21677 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
• 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI APHC010306552025 (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15418 OF 2025 Between: Pentakota Tirumala Venkata Seethamma Naidu @ Sanjay, S/o Venkataramana, Aged about 50 years, R/o. D.No. 50-116-30, MIG 117, N-E Lay out, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. The Superintendent of Police, Anakapalle District, Anakapalle. The Station House Officer, Munagapaka P.S Munagapaka, Visakhapatnam District. Pentakota kalyana chakravarthy, S/o Late Krishna Rao, Aged about 40 years. Business, residing near Ramalayam Vepachettu Center, Munagapaka (Village and Mandal), Anakapalli District. Pin. 531 033. 2. 3. 4. ...Respondent(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent Nos.2
, and 3 in not registering the crime on petitioner complaint dated 30.05.2025 receipt no. 1 against un official respondent as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent Nos.2 & 3 to consider the petitioners complaint dated 30.05.2025 by registering the crime pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: — The Court made the following: ORDER to
APHC010306552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15418/2025 Between; 1.PENTAKOTA TIRUMALA VENKATA SEETHAMMA NAIDU @ SANJAY, S/0 VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/0. D.NO. 50-116-30, MIG 117, N-E LAY OUT, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLE DISTRICT, ANAKAPALLE. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MUNAGAPAKA P.S MUNAGAPAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4.PENTAKOTA KALYANA CHAKRAVARTHY, S/0 LATE KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. BUSINESS, RESIDING NEAR RAMALAYAM VEPACHETTU CENTER, MUNAGAPAKA (VILLAGE AND MANDAL), ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. PIN. 531 033. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of
2 Hf W.P.NO.15418OF2025 respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not registering the crime on petitioner complaint dated 30.05.2025 vide receipt no. 1 against un official respondent as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent Nos.2 & 3 to consider the petitioners complaint dated 30.05.2025 by registering the crime pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
3 HN,J W.P.N0.15418 0F2025 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15418/2025
ORDER;-
1. Heard.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner’s house was trespassed and occupied by the 4*^^ respondent. Subsequently, the 4 th respondent has been collecting rents. In that regard, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 30.05.2025 to the 3'"^ respondent.
3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home Department submits that the petitioner’s report dated 30.05.2025 will be considered by the respondents, as per the law.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to disposed off the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself, directing the respondent Nos.2 & 3 to consider the petitioner’s report dated 30.05.2025, in accordance with law and as per the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, (for short, “BNSS”). As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- K. TATA RAO deputy REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Anakapalle District, Anakapalle.
r
3. The Station Visakhapatnam District.
4. One CC to Sri Mahadeva Kanthrigala, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
6. Three CD Copies House Officer, Munagapaka P.S Munagapaka, TF
'I HIGH COURT DATED:26/06/2025
ORDER WP 15418/2025 1 0 JUL 2025 ♦'jaiTOilSecUoiux^ o DISPOSING OF THE W.P. AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION, WITHOUT COSTS