204 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-11968-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.07.2025 Thandi Ram ...Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. B.R. Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents No.1 to 5 to adjust him in the office of respondent No.3 or respondent No.4. 2. The petitioner was retrenched on account of abolition of octroi. He was offered post in another department. The post offered was State level post. The petitioner rejected offered post on the ground that he was working on District level post. A substantial period of 25 years has expired. 3. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that he has no instructions, however, he may be granted liberty to move an appropriate application within three months from today, if cause survives. 4. Dismissed with aforesaid liberty. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 15.07.2025 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.07.16 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document