Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21672 (JHR)

TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LTD REPRESENTED ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER ABHIRUP GHOSH v. STATE OF JHARKHAND THRO THE SECRETARY DEPTT OF PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS AND RAJBHASHA

WPC/3215/2025 · 2025-07-30

Rajesh Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:20987 1 W.P.(C) No.3215 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.3215 of 2025 ----- Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited, a Housing Finance Company having its registered office at 11th Floor, Tower A, Peninsula Business Park, Ganpatrao Kadam Marg, Lower Parel, P.O. & P.S. Lower Parel, District Mumbai, Maharashtra and having one of its Branch offices at 1st Floor, Gayathri Enclave, K-Road, Bistupur, Jamshedpur-831001, Jharkhand represented through its authorized officer Abhirup Ghosh, S/o Achintya Kumar Ghosh, R/o 313 Parnashree Pally, P.O. & P.S. Parnashree Pally, District-Kolkata, West Bengal. .......... Petitioner. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasa, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, Jamshedpur, District –East Singhbhum. 3. Mr. Avinash Kumar Pattanaik, S/o Late Ashok Kumar Das, R/o Sunder Bhawan, Durga Bari Road, P.O. & P.S. Parsudih, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand. 4. Mrs. Rinku Pattanaik, R/o Sunder Bhawan, Durga Bari Road, P.O. & P.S. Parsudih, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand. 5. Ms. Swarna Lata Das, Mother of Mr. Avinash Kumar Pattanaik, R/o Sunder Bhawan, Durga Bari Road, P.O. & P.S. Parsudih, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand. .......... Respondents. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Chiranjeev Bhaduri, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ankit Kumar, AC to S.C.-I ----- Order No.02 Date: 30.07.2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondent no. 2- the Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum to dispose of the application 2025:JHHC:20987 2 W.P.(C) No.3215 of 2025 preferred by the petitioner under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short “SARFAESI Act, 2002”). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed an application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 before the respondent no.2 on 19th April, 2018, however, no effective step has been taken on the same by the said respondent which has compelled it to prefer the present writ petition. It is further submitted that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by the order/judgment dated 15th October, 2024 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.5549 of 2024 (HDB Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. versus the State of Jharkhand and Others). 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State also submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition is covered by the aforesaid order/judgment. 4. Considering that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of HDB Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. (supra), the same is also disposed of directing the respondent no.2 to expedite the proceeding in question and to conclude the same as soon as possible and not beyond the period of 30 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Rohit/