Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21671 (AP)

Matta Sirisha Kiran v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/14303/2019 · 2025-09-02

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010305472019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14303/2019 Between: 1. MATTA SIRISHA KIRAN, D/O. MANIKYALA RAO, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, PROPRIETOR OF M/S. SIRI BIO TECHNOLOGIES, 83-D, GAJULAMANDYAM, RENIGUNTA MANAL, R/O.3-146, NR BAPTIST CHURCH, LINGAVARAM(V AND POST), GUDIVADA(M), KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIR, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICEURBAN, TIRUPATI UPD, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GAJULAMANDYAM P.S., GAJULAMANDYAM, TIRUPATI URBAN, CHITTOOR DIST., ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.14303 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ/Order/Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not completing the investigation in Crime No.39/2016 by filing charge sheet on the file of the Station House Officer, Gajulamandyam P.S., Tirupati Urban as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction besides violation of Art.14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to complete the investigation and file charge sheet in Cr.No.39/2016 on the file of the Station House Officer, Gajulamandyam P.S., Tirupati Urban forthwith within prescribed time and to pass…” 2. None appeared for the petitioner, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well as on the previous adjournment. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03.09.2025 Pmk 3 08 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:14303 OF 2019 Date: 03.09.2025 Pmk